How about when a buisness gets a fine they get a similar fine. If I get a speeding ticket, the fine is about 3 days pay for me. Even if they do not, the fines levied are almost always so small they are a joke. then, when sued, draw out the court battle so long that the companies in question will die long before any litigation is resolved. They can, just like Apple, Microsoft, and everyone else, just ignore it. Google, like every other corporation on earth, doesn't give a shit about anti-competition regulation. They don't want to force you to use another companies product simply because they don't offer a "google version" The biggest threat that Google would ever face would be a company offering something they do not, and then that something becoming ubiquitous enough that the rival company could offer the same service that Google does and kill off their business (see facebook)ģ. I don' think this needs a "Good amount of users" Much like microsoft, Google wants to offer you every option. The more places you can backup your data the better. These people will probobly have a google account, a dropbox account, etc. It's people at home that want to backup photos and such. Googles target audience is not the corporate user. I don't necessarily disagree with your arguments but I'd like to offer arguments to each:ġ. Maybe not for people like my father, who's STILL on hotmail, but for people who use email heavily that was certainly a large part of the motivation. The desire to keep one constant email address is exactly why Gmail was so popular. Went from a dozen or so spams a day to less than one a month) So.I went from changing addresses every six months to having the same address for about eight years now. Some of that was due to storage, some due to spam (When gmail launched there was no comparison with the spam filters. I think I went through four email accounts in those two years. In the two years before gmail launched the situation with email storage was really getting to be a problem, due to increasing internet speed and file sizes. Yes, users don't want a new email address. #WUALA SHUTDOWN PLUS#Plus I've gone through four or five computers since getting Gmail, so files that I can currently just grab out of my email would have otherwise been scattered across six or seven hard drives. xyz than I am to remember where the hell I stored that file. #WUALA SHUTDOWN PDF#I'm a lot more likely to remember that I got a PDF of that two semesters ago from Ms. Your guess is as good as mine as to what the limit was with a 2 meg inbox.) The search helps a lot too, though that's obviously related - no need for search it if you can't store it. Most providers still limit it to 10 megs, while Gmail is 20. 'email it to yourself' or even 'email it to me' was not a feasible way to transfer or store files until Gmail (Gmail was also the first, and still one of the few, providers to allow large attachments. For me at least, Gmail's storage capacity revolutionized email. Others - hell, I still have attachments of hundreds of kilobytes, sometimes even megabytes, from five years ago that I pull up occasionally. Granted, a lot of my gmail emails I could do without. I would generally overflow those in 6 months to a year. Before Gmail existed, the largest mailbox capacity that existed (as far as I know) was Fastmail, with 10 megs, with 1-2mb being common (hotmail, yahoo, aol, etc). My Gmail account is currently using 2.5 GIGS. They already have this problem in other markets. On top of that Google has serious problem with anti-competition regulators and this is just going to make those issues worse when Dropbox and other companies will demand Google to stop leveraging their search engine against them. They already know so much - hell, they track Slashdot too. Lastly, but even more so importantly, putting everything for Google to datamine and crawl is just stupid. #WUALA SHUTDOWN PROFESSIONAL#Hell, most of them are free for home users, and I really wouldn't trust Google with my company or work data - I would use a professional hosting service with SLA and company that has no need to mine my data. There are tons of companies offering their services with ridiculously low profit margins. I also fail to see why this would get any good amount of users even if Google did advertise it correctly - unlike their search engine, gmail and youtube, cloud storage is nothing new. This would be a huge problem with cloud storage like Google Drive. For starters Google has a long history of abandoning projects after they fail to gain users on them. There are two large, very real problems with Google Drive.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |